Nike – good or bad?

Nike is dandyA mill called Samyang in Vietnam (a grinder under Nike contract) seems to be keeping fine working levels within the building. It employs 5,200 people, just about of them organism women. The factory is made up of sextet big buildings with well-kept surroundings. Inside, there argon fans keeping the workers cool, fire extinguishers about in the case of an emergency, and workers can easily penetration goggles, masks and gloves if they need them.Workers get double the local average of $54 per month and an annual bonus of at least unity months salary. Other factories get a tie little in rural areas, factories tolerate $35 per month, in suburbs they feed $40 per month, and in cities, $45 per month. In state- possess factories (factories owned by the government), workers get a surprisingly low $15 per month both this notes they are getting has allowed most of them ( cardinal quarters) to buy a television, many to conduct a motorbike, some to perplex phones, etc. Not only does this improve their life, provided it besides allows other businesses such as petrol stations, electronic repair shops, etc. to function properly and make money too. This is called the multiplier effect.Nike has made changes to improve wellness and safety. In 1998, it replaced the very hazardous petroleum-based solvents with less harmful water-based ones. In 1999, an expert in the field went to verify Nike had actually through with(p) this at the Tae Kwang Vina factory in Vietnam. The research worker found that Nike had indeed replaced the compound and had too installed local exhaust ventilation systems. They also discovered that Nike had trained certain mental faculty personnel aspects of health and safety.Nike is badNike does not own the factories their vesture are manufacture in. This means they can leave at any time, leaving thousands of workers unemployed and chip for their life while they find another(prenominal) job. For example, on February 22nd 2 008, the BJ&J factory in the Dominic Republic announced that it was red ink to slowly fire workers and close. The factory, owned by Korean company called Yupoong, was making Nike caps at the time.In the Tae Kwang Vina factory mentioned earlier, some health and safety issues remained. some sections of the factory were politic exposed to hazardous chemicals, and to high heating plant and noise levels. In 1997, it was found that workers in a different factory were universe exposed to 100 times the good limit of Toluene, a toxic gas.Nike gets its clothes made in countries with free passel zones where it is illegal or extremely tall(prenominal) for workers to organise into trade unions. It is practically unachievable for workers to get infract conditions (such as better pay, improved health and safety, etc.) when they cannot get unneurotic and form a united assort to approach their boss.However, this said, some factory workers have done it before and achieved what they were p rotesting for. The Ching Luh Nike factory has 21,000 employees, and in June 2008, after going on prompt for 2 days, they managed to get Nike to increase their proceeds by $6 a month.Some people think that the minimum wage in countries is enough to survive because the apostrophize of living in that particular democracy is lower too. The chart below proves this to be wrong with three primary countries that Nike manufactures in.Nike doesnt pay lots to its workers. In many countries, they stop way under the predicted living wage. The dodge shows the average wage of all the factories in that country, and the living wage in each. The entropy presented is only an average. Some factory workers get in only $1.60 a day, where the price of three meals a day is $2.00.